Immunologic monitoring in kidney transplant recipients

Transplant biopsy has always been the gold standard for assessing the immune response to a kidney allograft (Chandraker A: Diagnostic techniques in the work-up of renal allograft dysfunction-an update. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 8:723-728, 1999). A biopsy is not without risk and is unable to predict rejection and is only diagnostic once rejection has already occurred. However, in the past two decades, we have seen an expansion in assays that can potentially put an end to the "drug level" era, which until now has been one of the few tools available to clinicians for monitoring the immune response. A better understanding of the mechanisms of rejection and tolerance, and technological advances has led to the development of new noninvasive methods to monitor the immune response. In this article, we discuss these new methods and their potential uses in renal transplant recipients.

Living-donor kidney transplantation across ABO barriers: the first case in Thailand

Background: Transplantation among ABO blood group incompatibility was considered an absolute contraindication until recent development of successful protocols. A living-donor across ABO barriers may provide another option for end-stage kidney disease patients. Objective: To report the first case of ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplantation (ABOi-LKT) in Thailand. Patients and method: The kidney transplantation across ABO barriers was performed following the Japanese recommended protocol. The kidney recipient was a thirty-four years old woman with blood group-O, whereas the kidney donor was her brother with blood group A. To reduce anti-donor (anti-blood group-A antibody) blood levels, the patient underwent double filtration plasmapheresis and received an intravenous anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. A maintenance immunosuppressive regimen was similar to the one of ABO-compatible setting. Results: The kidney allograft had immediate good function. The transplantation was uneventful, and the patient went home within two weeks. Kidney allograft biopsies were performed on a protocol-driven basis at time-zero, the first and sixth month post-transplantation. Histologic studies showed unremarkable findings. The patient is now twelve months after transplantation and has achieved excellent kidney function. Conclusion: ABOi-LKT provides an alternative treatment for end-stage kidney disease patients. A multi-center study of ABOi-LKT in Thailand is ongoing, and this may change the national policy of organ donation in the near future.

Successful treatment of polyomavirus infection in kidney allograft recipients: case reports and literature review

Background: Polyomavirus nephropathy, also termed BK virus nephropathy, is an infectious complication after kidney transplantation, causing allograft failure. The state of immunosuppression of the patient is the principal risk for the infection. Most cases of BK virus nephropathy were associated with the use of potent immunosuppressive regimens like tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. To the best of our knowledge, no patient with BK virus nephropathy has been reported in Southeast Asia.Objective: We report two cases of BK virus nephropathy in patients who received the immunosuppressive regimen of sirolimus with cyclosporine. We also review the literature regarding the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and treatment strategies.